Why? It's Christmas in July except it's just April!
- The City will see massive increases in property tax revenue because of the 30% increase in property revaluations citywide.
- The City won its water system lawsuit, regaining millions it thought it might lose.
- The City recently increased fees on stormwater charges, water fees, development charges, and parking fees which will bring in another $1.5 million.
- The City has seen unprecedented hotel development, promising hundreds of thousands of new tourists in the next couple of years!
- The City's newest tourist attraction, New Belgium, has opened with the promise of hundreds of thousands of visitors each year!
If it sounds too good to be true, it is.
Despite all of this, the City Council is actually considering increasing property tax rates above revenue neutral. How do we know? Councilman Gordon Smith outlines the reasons why:
"..stuck in an impending sense of scarcity" - Councilman Gordon Smith
To explain in taxpayer terms between the lines:
1) The cost to finance and initially startup the $74 million bond package voters approved last November, the City would need to add an additional 3.5 cent tax. This was determined when the bond package was put forth to taxpayers back in November.
2) The cost of paying the debt payments on the City's current debt is rising. The City currently pays $12 million a year in debt payments for bonds it issued in the last 2 years ($48 million). No mention yet as to how much this will be in 2017.
3) The City is projecting an additional $1 million increase of the Transit budget.
4) The City is projecting pay raises increases from $1.5 to $2.5 million this year.
5) Lastly, but not mentioned, the City has no idea what the RADTIP project will cost to construct but at the very minimum it will be around $20 million. Final bids will be approved in June.
Whose to blame?
Any time taxes are raised, the City Council and City Manager tries to point the finger of blame at anything but itself. This year, the City Council and City Manager, in alignment with our local media, has already begun publishing articles to that effect:
1) Blame the business owners
Joel Burgess of the Citizen-Times recently wrote an article entitled, "How Asheville does (and doesn't) tax you." In a recent budget meeting, both Mayor Manheimer and City Manager Gary Jackson, commented that "this was not an equitable budget" and the City gets no benefit from all the business growth, only the business costs such as increased tourism on our streets and crime. What they were lamenting about is not getting any part of the hotel tax, forgetting that it is this SAME City Council that has approved the last 7 new hotel projects. The City has also forgotten that business owners pay property taxes, larger rates on water and stormwater, business licenses fees, development fees, etc. Most importantly, the City has forgotten that it is these businesses - beer, arts, restaurants, etc. that make Asheville attractive to so many visitors.
2) Blame the government
This week, the same local media published an opinion article by "Guest Columnist" Rich Lee, "At budget time, all hands on deck". The Citizen-Times failed to mention that he is a candidate for City Council but did note his role on two City commissions (Greenways and Multimodal - the same commissions responsible for a huge chunk of the city's spending). In the article, Rich Lee lays the groundwork for blaming the Federal government who is cutting funds for transit over the next 3 years (not all in one year). Councilman Gordon Smith has already mentioned these cuts during the budget worksessions held in March and April. (It's like these two work together.)
3) Blame the bonds
In an odd twist, proponents of the $74 Million Bond (City Council and admittedly, Candidate Rich Lee ) are beginning to fudge the truth saying that no bond money has been spent and because of the bond lawsuit, the City will pay higher interest rates. Does Rich Lee, a financial advisor with Edward Jones, have the inside scoop on bond interest rates? If he is elected, can he buy the City bonds?
The City predetermined the amount of tax it would need to raise if the bonds were passed last year based on different tax revaluation scenarios. Council has already declared during its budget worksessions that it is going ahead with adding a 3.5 cent tax to pay for the bond costs and this was the projected cost all along, with or without a lawsuit. Furthermore, Asheville Unreported has learned that this tax will be collected and put in the general fund wherein the City can immediately begin using it despite any lawsuit. It is not required that the City put these funds in a separate account. In other words and to be clear, the City gets its bond monies with or without the lawsuit.
4) Blame the police and the low income transit riders
Last, but certainly not least, the Council looks to blame its own police force and the low income transit riders.
Citing massive overtime, the City could spend another $1 million over the next few years and cut back overtime by $300K+ a year. It could also manage all these tourists and new districts (South Slope was mentioned several times) that are becoming hot spots for activity. Although Asheville has an "A" for beauty, it has an "F" for crime. Seems like doing something about that part of the report card makes sense but why blame them?
On the transit side, the City cites demand for expanding services and hours although the last time it did a transit study was in 2009 and since then it has failed to keep up with the purchase of new buses or maintenance. In addition, the $1 million increase will NOT go directly toward expanded services but to the cost of the contract to manage the Transit - we are assuming this means more drivers and more time but that was extremely unclear during the budget worksession. In fact, many details were unclear.
The question is, who is really responsible? The City's management and leadership:
- Choosing Greenways over Maintenance - The City admits to not maintaining streets and parks for the last several years which is what forced the demand for the $74 million bond package and yet each year, they dedicate more and more to Greenways with each one costing at least $1 million per mile. One example of poor maintenance is stormwater drainage. While the City has doubled its revenue from stormwater charges in the last two years, their own annual stormwater reports reflect no increase in the amount of equipment or debris removal.
- Massive Debt instead of Affordable Housing - The City leveraged massive development projects such as RADTIP which will cost city taxpayers $25 to $35 million, even exclusive of any grants. Not one penny of that will go toward affordable housing. The $74 million bond debt makes Asheville's per capita debt the same as Charlotte. It's a debt taxpayers will be paying on for at least the next 20 years.
- Top Pay & More People vs. Less Work -
- The City's staff and salaries have ballooned. All top managers earn more than $100,000 while the average income in Asheville is $28,000. Heck, even City Council is paid well. The Mayor, on top of her salary as a lawyer, earns another $21,000 from the City, one of the top paying councils in the region.
- The City Manager's department alone has grown from 1 City Manager to now employing 2 additional assistant city managers even when the City population has not dramatically increased. Gary Jackson earns $227,000 a year in salary and benefits. Combine that with the two other city managers and his department represents $600,000 a year.
- The City's legal department prior to the current City Attorney, Robin Currin was a small staff and now is a small law firm representing $1 million of the budget.
These are just a few examples and the tip of the iceberg in municipal financial mismanagement. A legacy of massive debt and massive salaries are responsible for what Gordon calls the "impending sense of scarcity" in our City budget.
Report by Mari Peterson, Research and Data for Asheville Unreported